Verified Document

Enterprise Integration Act Of 2002 And SCM Case Study

Enterprise Integration Act of 2002 and SCM How will setting supply chain standards improve supply chain management?

The Enterprise Integration Act of 2002 was initiated by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) with the goal of helping companies coordinate supply chain information exchange and improve efficiencies (Thibodeau, 2002). The need for standardization stemmed from soaring costs and lengthy design and transaction timelines -- just a few of several challenges revealed in a1999 study conducted by the NIST. The study estimated that the auto industry alone would see $1 billion in annual supply chain savings with improved enterprise integration (Yimin et al., 2011). Enterprise integration refers to seamless electronic integration along a vertical supply chain (Thibodeau, 2002).

Manufacturers in today's marketplace require flexibility, adequate time to respond to shifts in customer preference, and efficiency (Jett, 2008). Today, more customized and specialized products are necessary to meet fluctuating consumer demands. Streamlining information exchanges -- without data loss or corruption -- gives manufactures the ability to meet such demands (Yimin et al., 2011). At the time the Act was passed, most software and information technology systems lacked interoperability (Jett, 2008). Incompatible applications prevented manufacturers and suppliers from easily sharing data or collaborating on design specifications, modifications and other pertinent elements of the manufacturing process.

In addition, dispersed supply chains and operating environments are sometimes characterized by multiple IT platforms and outsourcing strategies that vary in scope. Standardization helps suppliers coordinate information exchange throughout the supply chain more efficiently, so that information can flow to all participants (Thibodeau, 2002). This enables everyone involved in the manufacturing process to react to changes, stay informed, exchange ideas, and respond appropriately to changing...

This kind of integration assists businesses, large and small, in reducing costs and design cycle times and increasing efficiency when changing a product. Under the Act, NIST has worked with industries to develop road maps that outline the steps necessary to become more electronically integrated. Industry participants then develop a voluntary agreement for standards and practices for information exchange. Such measures help to trim costs from the supply chain.
The economic downturn and increased competition placed immense pressure on the bottom lines of many manufacturers (Jett, 2008). Standardization helped leverage scale, increase the visibility of inventory to more optimally align product supply with customer demand, and increase end-to-end transparency (Yimin et al., 2011). Information technology and web capabilities have allowed the manufacturing industry in particular to fully integrate its supply chain so that information flows freely (Thibodeau, 2002). However, without standards that all supply chain participants adhere to integration does not bear fruit.

The NIST works with organizations and industries to identify what research, testing, and development needs to be undertaken to develop information exchange standards (Yimin et al., 2011). They are experts at bringing together different parties and establishing standards. Businesses using standardization minimize operating issues and improve service level performance by focusing on simplicity and reliability. A hiccup at any point in the supply chain can result in the deterioration of shareholder value and damage to a company's overall brand. Without the standardization of roles, processes and controls, the likelihood of a major mishap increases substantially. When too many people have the authority to change an order at any point in the supply chain fulfillment cycle -- from the time an order is received by manufacturing through to logistics and delivery -- higher costs, lower…

Sources used in this document:
References

1. Jett, Q. (2008). Mastering the Supply Chain. Electric Perspectives, 33(3), 62.

2. Thibodeau, P. (2002). Supply Chain Standards Up for Federal Funding. Computerworld, 36(42), 6.

3. Yimin, W., Gilland, W., & Tomlin, B. (2011). Regulatory Trade Risk and Supply Chain Strategy. Production & Operations Management, 20(4), 522-540. doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2010.01167.x
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now